(professional.wsj.com) Berkshire said Friday in its second-quarter financial filing with regulators that it reached an agreement to terminate contracts with a notional value of $8.25 billion, or about half the total outstanding. It didn't name the party on the other side of the deal or say when it reached the agreement, other than to say it came after June 30.
The move effectively reduces Berkshire's exposure to defaults by state and local governments, many of which have been under intense budget pressure at a time of weak employment and soft housing prices, which have hit tax collections. Three California cities sought bankruptcy protection last month, and a state budget task force issued a report calling current municipal finance arrangements unsustainable.
"The stigma has probably been reduced when you get very sizable cities like Stockton or San Bernardino to do it," Mr. Buffett said last month on Bloomberg Television in reference to municipal bankruptcy filings, which can expose bondholders to losses.
Before the financial crisis, the billionaire investor's Omaha, Neb., conglomerate sold insurance-like contracts on over $16 billion in debt issued by over 500 states and municipalities. In exchange for payments upfront, Berkshire in essence agreed to make payouts if these municipalities default on their debts. So far there have been few such defaults.
Even before the latest move, the size of Berkshire's derivative bet on municipalities paled in comparison to its $33 billion wager on four of the world's major stock indexes, including the Standard & Poor's 500. That bet forces Berkshire to pay its trading partners if the stock indexes lose value over the term of the agreements, which don't begin to expire until 2018. Mr. Buffett has said he expects the derivatives to be profitable for Berkshire, in part because the $4.8 billion Berkshire was paid to take on the risk has been his to invest for several years already. Mr. Buffett and an unnamed counterparty agreed to cancel some of those bets in late 2010.
Mr. Buffett has long warned about potential defaults by municipalities, in part because of rising pension obligations.
|